Re: implementing hierarchy
From: --CELKO-- (jcelko212_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 02/15/05
- Next message: james: "Re: Parent-Child relationship"
- Previous message: Alejandro Mesa: "RE: call order"
- In reply to: Louis Davidson: "Re: implementing hierarchy"
- Next in thread: Louis Davidson: "Re: implementing hierarchy"
- Reply: Louis Davidson: "Re: implementing hierarchy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Feb 2005 10:40:05 -0800
>> Then Joe C has a post where he gives a more complex version that has
some benefits, but is still quite messy, depending on your actual
needs. <<
What I find to be weird is that the kids who grew up with HTML, XML, et
al think that the nested sets model is easier that the adjacency list
model. Us old farts who used to use pointer chains and traverse links
found the adjacency list model to be the most natural.
The other advantage of the CTE is that you can avoid creating a VIEW
for a table expression that has to be used twice or more in a query.
- Next message: james: "Re: Parent-Child relationship"
- Previous message: Alejandro Mesa: "RE: call order"
- In reply to: Louis Davidson: "Re: implementing hierarchy"
- Next in thread: Louis Davidson: "Re: implementing hierarchy"
- Reply: Louis Davidson: "Re: implementing hierarchy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|