Re: 100% CPU Util on Simple Update Query
From: Hugo Kornelis (hugo_at_pe_NO_rFact.in_SPAM_fo)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: news.microsoft.com: "Dynamic Column Names?"
- Previous message: Adam Machanic: "Re: Stored Procedure help"
- In reply to: Joel H: "Re: 100% CPU Util on Simple Update Query"
- Next in thread: Joel H: "Re: 100% CPU Util on Simple Update Query"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:20:29 +0100
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:59:06 -0800, Joel H wrote:
(snip)
>There is no WHERE clause. Even in the original statement, all of the work is
>done on one row at a time.
(snip)
Hi Joel,
You're contradicting yourself -- if there is no WHERE clause, you're
working on all rows in the table at once, not one at a time.
Best, Hugo
-- (Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)
- Next message: news.microsoft.com: "Dynamic Column Names?"
- Previous message: Adam Machanic: "Re: Stored Procedure help"
- In reply to: Joel H: "Re: 100% CPU Util on Simple Update Query"
- Next in thread: Joel H: "Re: 100% CPU Util on Simple Update Query"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|