Re: Using Cursors
From: --CELKO-- (jcelko212_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: Gail Erickson [MS]: "Re: simple ALTER TABLE question"
- Previous message: Tom Moreau: "Re: temp table troubles"
- In reply to: Jon Waterhouse: "Re: Using Cursors"
- Next in thread: galenboyerdev_at_hotpop.com: "Re: Using Cursors"
- Reply: galenboyerdev_at_hotpop.com: "Re: Using Cursors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Jan 2005 16:10:54 -0800
>> Cursors are no more an Oracle habit than they are a SQL Server
habit. They
are just as necessary/unnecessary in Oracle as they are in SQL Server.
<<
I have to agree with Dave on that one. Looking at Oracle code at
client sites, I find that it is usually full of cursors. The CONNECT
BY is a hidden cursor and apparently so are other proprietary
constructs that depend on an ordering of the data. I think they really
are a bad habit among Oracle programmers, just like SQL Server
programmers slap IDENTITY columns on tables to avoid natural keys.
Good idea? No. Required? No. Happens a lot? Yep.
- Next message: Gail Erickson [MS]: "Re: simple ALTER TABLE question"
- Previous message: Tom Moreau: "Re: temp table troubles"
- In reply to: Jon Waterhouse: "Re: Using Cursors"
- Next in thread: galenboyerdev_at_hotpop.com: "Re: Using Cursors"
- Reply: galenboyerdev_at_hotpop.com: "Re: Using Cursors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading