Re: Foreign Key Question
From: Louis Davidson (dr_dontspamme_sql_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/07/05
- Next message: Jorge Matos: "RE: SQL Server Cursors in SP or ADO.NET loops for Complex Processing?"
- Previous message: Louis Davidson: "Re: DEFAULT doesn't work in COALESCE?"
- In reply to: Aaron [SQL Server MVP]: "Re: Foreign Key Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:32:43 -0600
> Anyway, all I was saying was I can understand it, and it makes a hell of a
> lot more sense than tbl. There are plenty of reasons against it, and I
> can
> understand that too.
>
I know, I know I wasn't so much disagreeing with you as I was trying to
validate my own opinions. This group can be a good baptism by fire for
ideas.
> Great, religious war forthcoming, good going Louis. :-)
I seem to have a knack at that sometimes
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Louis Davidson - drsql@hotmail.com SQL Server MVP Compass Technology Management - www.compass.net Pro SQL Server 2000 Database Design - http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=266 Note: Please reply to the newsgroups only unless you are interested in consulting services. All other replies may be ignored :) "Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" <ten.xoc@dnartreb.noraa> wrote in message news:%23gqsPZP9EHA.3416@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >> I used to, but then I had to ask, why? Anyone who needs to know if it is > a >> view or not can tell from the catalog. > > That depends on how much access they have to the catalog. In a lot of > places, people don't have direct access to the database, but can see the > code that returns certain select (e.g. SELECT * FROM vConsumers). If I > have > a view that joins multiple tables, there are situations where I'm going to > do whatever it takes to prevent people from trying to do willy-nilly > updates/inserts if they get a consumer back that doesn't look right. > > If I have a table consumers, and I have a view that pulls in a few columns > from other tables, I'm probably likely to call it vConsumers, instead of > Consumers_With_A_Few_Extra_Columns. > > Anyway, all I was saying was I can understand it, and it makes a hell of a > lot more sense than tbl. There are plenty of reasons against it, and I > can > understand that too. > > Great, religious war forthcoming, good going Louis. :-) > >
- Next message: Jorge Matos: "RE: SQL Server Cursors in SP or ADO.NET loops for Complex Processing?"
- Previous message: Louis Davidson: "Re: DEFAULT doesn't work in COALESCE?"
- In reply to: Aaron [SQL Server MVP]: "Re: Foreign Key Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|