Re: all about transaction
From: Deepson Thomas (DeepsonThomas_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 12/14/04
- Next message: ce.souza_at_gmail.com: "Convert TimeStamp to DateTime have different behaviors on different databases"
- Previous message: Sharad: "Trigger for future checking"
- In reply to: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: all about transaction"
- Next in thread: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: all about transaction"
- Reply: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: all about transaction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:11:02 -0800
Thank u Hugo.
Now i feel something like even i know something abt transactions ....
Thank u so much for ur help ...Are you a DBA or a Programmer ??? . if i send
u email for any doubts or for sharing of info u hav any problem ?? .... my
email ID is deepson at gmail dot com
Keep in touch
Deepson
"Hugo Kornelis" wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:09:03 -0800, Deepson Thomas wrote:
>
> >Hi Hugo thanks once again ... i got the words chained and unchained from
> >sybase sqlserver ref...
> (snip)
>
> Hi Deepson,
>
> Well, Sybase is not SQL Server, though they do have the same ancestry.
>
> Based on your explanation of chained and unchaiend transactions in Sybase,
> I think that the only thing that is roughly comparable in SQL Server is
> the SET IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS [ON | OFF] command.
>
> With this setting on, most SQL statements (see Books Online for the full
> list) will automatically begin a transaction if one isn't active. This
> transaction will remain open until explicitly committed or rolled back or
> until an error condition occurs that implicitly rolls back the open
> transaction.
>
> With the implicit transaction setting off, transactions will only be
> started when an explicit BEGIN TRANSACTION is executed. Statements that
> are not enclosed in a transaction will still be executed as ATOMIC
> operations (as if the statement itself was enclosed between BEGIN TRAN and
> COMMIT TRAN).
>
> Best, Hugo
> --
>
> (Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)
>
- Next message: ce.souza_at_gmail.com: "Convert TimeStamp to DateTime have different behaviors on different databases"
- Previous message: Sharad: "Trigger for future checking"
- In reply to: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: all about transaction"
- Next in thread: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: all about transaction"
- Reply: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: all about transaction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|