Re: prefixing the tables with owner name
From: avnrao (avn_at_newsgroups.com)
Date: 11/17/04
- Next message: ElitEDooM: "Re: UPDATE(column) function in triggers"
- Previous message: Mike MacSween: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- In reply to: Anuradha: "prefixing the tables with owner name"
- Next in thread: Uri Dimant: "Re: prefixing the tables with owner name"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:25:33 +0530
yes. within stored procedures, if you use owner.objectname - it performs
better.
if you consistently use owner name on the objects referred within a stored
procedure, sql server can use in-memory plan on every execution.
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/stored_procedures.asp
Av.
http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/avnrao
http://www28.brinkster.com/avdotnet
"Anuradha" <Anuradha@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FB2D3385-9DC8-4F37-A45B-D31332710271@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
>
> Will prefixing the table with the owner cause any performance
improvements.
>
> Is it a suggested practice.
>
> thks in advance.
- Next message: ElitEDooM: "Re: UPDATE(column) function in triggers"
- Previous message: Mike MacSween: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- In reply to: Anuradha: "prefixing the tables with owner name"
- Next in thread: Uri Dimant: "Re: prefixing the tables with owner name"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|