Re: Dependencies in Enterprise Manager
From: Dan Guzman (guzmanda_at_nospam-online.sbcglobal.net)
Date: 11/06/04
- Next message: Mitch: "Counting values on row"
- Previous message: Joe Celko: "Re: How do u SELECT this one? SELECT rank=count(*)"
- In reply to: mark baekdal: "Re: Dependencies in Enterprise Manager"
- Next in thread: mark baekdal: "Re: Dependencies in Enterprise Manager"
- Reply: mark baekdal: "Re: Dependencies in Enterprise Manager"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 12:16:36 -0600
> can you build from your source code in seconds with no maintanence
Nope.
> is your database broken?
Nope.
-- Hope this helps. Dan Guzman SQL Server MVP "mark baekdal" <markbaekdal@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:35826629-161C-4AC5-BB22-1EAB02D94AF5@microsoft.com... > can you build from your source code in seconds with no maintanence, is > your > database broken? > > "Dan Guzman" wrote: > >> I agree that SQL Server dependency management leaves much to be desired >> but >> a sanity check is in order here. If you rename an executable (e.g. >> MyApp.exe to MyNewApp.exe), do you expect you source code to >> automagically >> get updated to reflect the change? If you rename a function or variable >> name in your application program, do you expect existing references to be >> changed as well? >> >> IMO, SQL Server database objects should be treated similarly to other >> application code. We keep DDL under source control so that these scripts >> can be used as the master copy to promote database changes. >> >> -- >> Hope this helps. >> >> Dan Guzman >> SQL Server MVP >>
- Next message: Mitch: "Counting values on row"
- Previous message: Joe Celko: "Re: How do u SELECT this one? SELECT rank=count(*)"
- In reply to: mark baekdal: "Re: Dependencies in Enterprise Manager"
- Next in thread: mark baekdal: "Re: Dependencies in Enterprise Manager"
- Reply: mark baekdal: "Re: Dependencies in Enterprise Manager"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
