Re: Row Order
From: Aaron [SQL Server MVP] (ten.xoc_at_dnartreb.noraa)
Date: 11/02/04
- Next message: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Backup & Restore"
- Previous message: localhost: "Split VarChar Data?"
- In reply to: Tom Moreau: "Re: Row Order"
- Next in thread: Guadala Harry: "Re: Row Order"
- Reply: Guadala Harry: "Re: Row Order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:23:20 -0500
> Order inside the table is not guaranteed. However, order in the result
set
> of a query can be - with an ORDER BY. Why is it that you "need for the
rows
> to exist in the temp table in the order specified by the ORDER BY clause"?
My guess is that a cursor then operates against the #temp table, and
somebody doesn't want to have to add an ORDER BY clause to the cursor
definition. :-)
- Next message: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Backup & Restore"
- Previous message: localhost: "Split VarChar Data?"
- In reply to: Tom Moreau: "Re: Row Order"
- Next in thread: Guadala Harry: "Re: Row Order"
- Reply: Guadala Harry: "Re: Row Order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]