Re: Shrinking the index file group
From: Andrew J. Kelly (sqlmvpnooospam_at_shadhawk.com)
Date: 10/22/04
- Next message: Bonj: "Re: deploying extended stored proc"
- Previous message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: Transaction handling - Read Committed"
- In reply to: Patrick: "Shrinking the index file group"
- Next in thread: Patrick: "Re: Shrinking the index file group"
- Reply: Patrick: "Re: Shrinking the index file group"
- Reply: Kalen Delaney: "Re: Shrinking the index file group"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:32:04 -0400
When you use DBCC SHRINKDATABASE you leave control up to SQL Server as to
exactly how much it will shrink each file including the log file. Use DBCC
SHRINKFILE instead to ensure you are getting what you want. But remember
you can not shrink a file smaller than it was originally created at.
-- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP "Patrick" <patriarck@gmail.com> wrote in message news:eh3K$HFuEHA.3980@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Hi Freinds, > I have a seperate file group for mu indexes. I can't see any difference on > file size after shrinking the database. > > How can I shrink the index file group too? > > Thanks in advance, > Pat >
- Next message: Bonj: "Re: deploying extended stored proc"
- Previous message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: Transaction handling - Read Committed"
- In reply to: Patrick: "Shrinking the index file group"
- Next in thread: Patrick: "Re: Shrinking the index file group"
- Reply: Patrick: "Re: Shrinking the index file group"
- Reply: Kalen Delaney: "Re: Shrinking the index file group"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|