Re: SET NOCOUNT ON OPTION
From: Aaron [SQL Server MVP] (ten.xoc_at_dnartreb.noraa)
Date: 10/19/04
- Next message: simon: "Updating derived table"
- Previous message: Wayne Snyder: "Re: replication"
- In reply to: Philippe [MS]: "Re: SET NOCOUNT ON OPTION"
- Next in thread: Philippe [MS]: "Re: SET NOCOUNT ON OPTION"
- Reply: Philippe [MS]: "Re: SET NOCOUNT ON OPTION"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:06:20 -0400
> Therefore, you need to have the NOCOUNT set to OFF
Can you show an example where the NOCOUNT setting affects @@ROWCOUNT? Like
Adam, I use SET NOCOUNT ON in every single procedure I write, and I have
never found a case where I had to set it OFF at any point in the procedure.
- Next message: simon: "Updating derived table"
- Previous message: Wayne Snyder: "Re: replication"
- In reply to: Philippe [MS]: "Re: SET NOCOUNT ON OPTION"
- Next in thread: Philippe [MS]: "Re: SET NOCOUNT ON OPTION"
- Reply: Philippe [MS]: "Re: SET NOCOUNT ON OPTION"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]