Re: Dynamic column specification in table update
From: Joe Celko (jcelko212_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: Guy Brom: "Return days of month"
- Previous message: Helene Day: "Re: Using Union All is there a way to add a column to display the name of the table?"
- In reply to: Louis Davidson: "Re: Dynamic column specification in table update"
- Next in thread: Louis Davidson: "Re: Dynamic column specification in table update"
- Reply: Louis Davidson: "Re: Dynamic column specification in table update"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 06:21:37 -0700
>> Strange then that MS are adding Report writing tools right into SQL
Server? <<
Gasp! Do suppose that Bill Gates will next try to tie the OS and the
browser together to prevent browser competition? Why that would be
criminal! Oh, wait a minute, they did try that and it was criminal.
But at least they are not spending billions of dollars to lobby for laws
that will destroy Open Source. Oh wait a minute ... Then there is the
push for C# because Java was too popular, etc. etc.
mmmm, I think I see a pattern in Microsoft's behavior and it does not
favor users. Old farts remember when IBM was Satan and did what was
called "bundling" with their software until they were forced to stop.
The ore things change, the more they stay the same :)
--CELKO--
Please post DDL, so that people do not have to guess what the keys,
constraints, Declarative Referential Integrity, datatypes, etc. in your
schema are. Sample data is also a good idea, along with clear
specifications.
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
- Next message: Guy Brom: "Return days of month"
- Previous message: Helene Day: "Re: Using Union All is there a way to add a column to display the name of the table?"
- In reply to: Louis Davidson: "Re: Dynamic column specification in table update"
- Next in thread: Louis Davidson: "Re: Dynamic column specification in table update"
- Reply: Louis Davidson: "Re: Dynamic column specification in table update"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]