Re: SQL Server 2000 RDBMS or DBMS?
From: Tibor Karaszi (tibor_please.no.email_karaszi_at_hotmail.nomail.com)
Date: 10/06/04
- Next message: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: daily task, comparing data - how to go about it"
- Previous message: David Portas: "RE: Fetching records"
- In reply to: Drew: "SQL Server 2000 RDBMS or DBMS?"
- Next in thread: Adam Machanic: "Re: SQL Server 2000 RDBMS or DBMS?"
- Reply: Adam Machanic: "Re: SQL Server 2000 RDBMS or DBMS?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:58:05 +0200
None of the SQL based DBMS's out there are relational. I guess a DBMS can enforce uniqueness for the
whole row if you don't define a PK, or demand that you define a PK (else refuse to create a table).
But there are other things in the SQL language that makes it non-relational. Just the simple fact
that the result of a query is supposed to be a table (relation) and the SQL language allow for
duplicates in a resultset. I'm sure we can go on and on about this. Chris Date has written numerous
texts on the subject, check out any of hit critiques of the SQL language.
I haven't played with Tutorial D (did I get the name right?), but this is supposed to be based on a
new language (or perhaps Tutorial D *is* the language) which I take it adheres better to the
relational model.
IMO, SQL is here to stay, as least for a few more decades. Too much investment...
-- Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/ "Drew" <agarwalp@lucent.com> wrote in message news:e$fMNf4qEHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... >I was reading a monster thread on whether DBMS or RDBMS. Many of them said > that since MS Access allows the users to create table without primary key, > therefore it is not RDBMS. My Question even SQl Server allows tables without > primary key. So it also not RDBMS ? > > Thanks > >
- Next message: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: daily task, comparing data - how to go about it"
- Previous message: David Portas: "RE: Fetching records"
- In reply to: Drew: "SQL Server 2000 RDBMS or DBMS?"
- Next in thread: Adam Machanic: "Re: SQL Server 2000 RDBMS or DBMS?"
- Reply: Adam Machanic: "Re: SQL Server 2000 RDBMS or DBMS?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|