varchar
From: payyans (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/29/04
- Next message: David E Herbst: "Re: How to handle/strip out Quotes around string columns that can be n"
- Previous message: Steve Kass: "Re: compare EXISTS with IN using Execution Plan"
- Next in thread: Adam Machanic: "Re: varchar"
- Reply: Adam Machanic: "Re: varchar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:58:25 -0700
SQL Server 2000
---------------
Is there any disadvantage in defining the data type as
varchar(8000) instead of varchar(200) for the varchar
columns of my table? I know that the storage size of
varchar is the actual length in bytes of the data entered.
So there should not be any difference as far as the
storage is concerend. But, does SQL Server use the
declared length in the memory when working with such
columms?
Thanks in advance,
payyans
- Next message: David E Herbst: "Re: How to handle/strip out Quotes around string columns that can be n"
- Previous message: Steve Kass: "Re: compare EXISTS with IN using Execution Plan"
- Next in thread: Adam Machanic: "Re: varchar"
- Reply: Adam Machanic: "Re: varchar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|