Re: id record for each table
From: --CELKO-- (jcelko212_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: --CELKO--: "Re: dynamic columns?"
- Previous message: Adam Machanic: "Re: CASE with different date types"
- In reply to: Enric: "RE: id record for each table"
- Next in thread: Bradley M. Small: "Re: id record for each table"
- Reply: Bradley M. Small: "Re: id record for each table"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Jul 2004 18:38:52 -0700
>> If I've got a table which not own identity field [sic] how can I
look up a record [sic] based in their natural order [sic]. Something
like that: "I am looking for record [sic] number 1123" <<
You have completely missed the **entire foundations** of the
relational model.
Let's get back to the basics of an RDBMS. Rows are not records; fields
are not columns; tables are not files; there is no sequential access
or ordering in an RDBMS, so "first", "next", "last" and "natural
order" are **totally meaningless**. Tables model sets; sets are
completed wholes, not a sequence.
You have no idea what a LOGICAL key is. For some reason, you think
that a particular PHYSICAL implementation IS the logical model (not
all SQL product use physically contigous storage).
Please get any basic intro book on RDBMS and read it.
- Next message: --CELKO--: "Re: dynamic columns?"
- Previous message: Adam Machanic: "Re: CASE with different date types"
- In reply to: Enric: "RE: id record for each table"
- Next in thread: Bradley M. Small: "Re: id record for each table"
- Reply: Bradley M. Small: "Re: id record for each table"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|