Re: MS SQL Server - a plethora of limitations...
From: Erland Sommarskog (esquel_at_sommarskog.se)
Date: 06/10/04
- Next message: eagletender: "Search all tables, all fields?"
- Previous message: Aaron [SQL Server MVP]: "Re: Is There a Better Way? (Incrementing PK Column)"
- In reply to: Jeager_at_jeager.com: "Re: MS SQL Server - a plethora of limitations..."
- Next in thread: ChrisRath: "Re: MS SQL Server - a plethora of limitations..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 20:55:30 +0000 (UTC)
(Jeager@jeager.com) writes:
> Having worked on many RDBMS platforms (DB2, MS SQL Server, Interbase,
> MySQL, Oracle); I would be informed enough to say that MS SQL Server would
> never be considered better than Oracle in any shape or form other than
> cost.
Of course. In any attempt to use MS SQL Server as if it was Oracle,
SQL Server cannot but lose.
-- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/books.asp
- Next message: eagletender: "Search all tables, all fields?"
- Previous message: Aaron [SQL Server MVP]: "Re: Is There a Better Way? (Incrementing PK Column)"
- In reply to: Jeager_at_jeager.com: "Re: MS SQL Server - a plethora of limitations..."
- Next in thread: ChrisRath: "Re: MS SQL Server - a plethora of limitations..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|