Re: Partitioned View Problem
From: Greg Linwood (g_linwoodQhotmail.com)
Date: 05/13/04
- Next message: Learner: "Re: Help request with UPDATE/CASE"
- Previous message: Greg Linwood: "Re: Partitioned View Problem"
- In reply to: Babz: "Re: Partitioned View Problem"
- Next in thread: Greg Linwood: "Re: Partitioned View Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:27:07 +1000
Hi Babz
If you've already made the decision to insert directly into the base tables,
then you'll likely find PVs ok. They can offer significant improvements to
query performance, especially if the underlying base tables are located on
physically separated disks. The PV can also offer the Query Optimiser an
alternative to performing full table scans in many cases.
Regards,
Greg Linwood
SQL Server MVP
"Babz" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3F05CF94-4299-4E92-85AD-686A171E208B@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> Thanx a lot friends.
>
> I have given only the sample table in my last post. But in actual
scenario, daily thousands of records will be inserted in the tables. I
thought by using identity column i can simplify my primary key logic.
>
> My question is i have created view similar to partitioned view. I am
inserting directly to the base tables. But while selecting i am using that
view. Is this will help in improving my select queries. Becoz if i am
using the select query with out the view means, i have build the query
string in my sp and execute which is not best practice.
>
> Need Help
>
> Babz
>
- Next message: Learner: "Re: Help request with UPDATE/CASE"
- Previous message: Greg Linwood: "Re: Partitioned View Problem"
- In reply to: Babz: "Re: Partitioned View Problem"
- Next in thread: Greg Linwood: "Re: Partitioned View Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|