Re: backup log <my database> with no_log
From: Tibor Karaszi (tibor_please.no.email_karaszi_at_hotmail.nomail.com)
Date: 03/10/04
- Next message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: Update a date"
- Previous message: Jacco Schalkwijk: "Re: Update a date"
- In reply to: myoav: "backup log <my database> with no_log"
- Next in thread: yoav maimon: "Re: backup log <my database> with no_log"
- Reply: yoav maimon: "Re: backup log <my database> with no_log"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:35:04 +0100
The big question is why do you do a BACKUP LOG dbname WITH NO_LOG in the
first place? I can't think of a normal environment where you want to do
this.
(No, you can't make SQL Server *not* write this event, btw...)
-- Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp "myoav" <yoav.maimon@verint.com> wrote in message news:764401c406ab$06123f90$a601280a@phx.gbl... > im running sql agent job that backups database with "full" > recovery model. the last step of job is : backup log <my > database> with no_log. > > the job return success but still i'm getting an error in > the windows event viewer: "Database log truncated: > Database: <db name>." error 18278 > > what should i do to avoid this error in the event viewer? > thanks, >
- Next message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: Update a date"
- Previous message: Jacco Schalkwijk: "Re: Update a date"
- In reply to: myoav: "backup log <my database> with no_log"
- Next in thread: yoav maimon: "Re: backup log <my database> with no_log"
- Reply: yoav maimon: "Re: backup log <my database> with no_log"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|