Re: Analysis Services for Planning
From: Nigel Pendse (nigelp.nospam_at_olapreport.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Mubeen Hussain: "Re: Defining security roles using MDX"
- Previous message: Steve: "hi experts(condition in custom rollup)"
- In reply to: Karen Middleton: "Re: Analysis Services for Planning"
- Next in thread: Karen Middleton: "Re: Analysis Services for Planning"
- Reply: Karen Middleton: "Re: Analysis Services for Planning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:56:38 +0100
"Karen Middleton" <karenmiddleol@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a5fd468a.0410281707.204d7dfe@posting.google.com
> I agree what Nigel says and partly with what Howard says.
>
> What I felt so frustrating is there is totally no information in
> neither books online
> or in any of the books on Analysis Services to customers how to model
> and
> build what-if applications on analysis Services. I am really surprised
> that
> MS have not released even a few simple scenarios like cost planning or
> cash flow planning or sales planning some sample cubes and reports
> with
> the Excel addin.
>
> There is a big lack of know how on how to model a planning and
> budgetting
> application on Analysis Services - I guess this is the biggest gap in
> AS 2000 if it exists MS as not done any effort in making the user
> community
> aware of using this feature and none of the authors of a number of
> books
> on Analysis Services have endeavoured to make this known. It is really
> a
> sort of mystery how to do it. Many times users want to build some
> budgetting,
> planning and what-if applications in house and once they outgrow the
> AS 2000 and Excel Addin would like to go for something like MIS Plain
> or O2OLAP or whatever but even to do basic things there is no starter
> models.
>
> Perhaps if MS could take this onboard and do something.
I think the reason is probably that Analysis Services 2000 isn't often
used for planning apps, and when it is, it's usually in conjunction with
pre-built apps such as OutlookSoft Everest, Geac MPC or CIP ES, which
deal with a lot of the tricky functional/performance issues. Some
consultants have also developed techniques based on hard experience, but
I guess they don't want to give them away freely.
Of course, a lot will change with Yukon, which would also explain why
people may not be interested in documenting such techniques for what is
now a four year old product.
- Next message: Mubeen Hussain: "Re: Defining security roles using MDX"
- Previous message: Steve: "hi experts(condition in custom rollup)"
- In reply to: Karen Middleton: "Re: Analysis Services for Planning"
- Next in thread: Karen Middleton: "Re: Analysis Services for Planning"
- Reply: Karen Middleton: "Re: Analysis Services for Planning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|