Re: Load and Concurrency
From: mark hill (mark_at_mark-hill.com)
Date: 09/11/04
- Previous message: mark hill: "Re: QueryLog Question ?"
- In reply to: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Load and Concurrency"
- Next in thread: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Load and Concurrency"
- Reply: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Load and Concurrency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:36:34 GMT
I would also point out that it that for every role , you could end up with a
copy of the dimension you are trying to secure in memory.
If your dimension is big you could run into performance issues.
Mark
"Dave Wickert [MSFT]" <dwickert@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:u9UtFCQlEHA.896@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> 1) At 700 roles you will see some impact when running Analysis Manager. It
> will slowdown considerably. The issue is that it is written in VB and VB
> objects must be fully instantiated before DSO can manipulate them -- DSO
> is
> the API which Analysis Manager uses under the covers to update your
> server.
> How much of an impact varies from customer to customer; situation to
> situation. My recommendation would be for you to prototype it. You don't
> need 700 ADSI users to do this.. just 700 roles. The actual number of NT
> accounts doesn't matter at all. You might look at using DSO/XML as a way
> to
> create a database/cube with 700 roles in it. Just generate the XML, edit
> it
> appropriately to create your roles, change the database name and create it
> from the revised XML. DSO/XML can be found here:
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=10744518-a2be-4534-8092-6be753fcc7bf&DisplayLang=en
>
> If you find that you can't live with the manability of Analysis Manager at
> this level, drop me a line and I can send you a "packet" I have on how to
> configure dynamic security. Dynamic security has a single role, and maps
> the
> USERNAME to a set of allow members. Its pros are that it only takes a
> single
> role; its cons are that it requires considerable management structures and
> administrative steps over and beyond what Analysis Services provides. If
> you
> are a member of SQL PASS, (http://www.sqlpass.org) look at their archive
> of
> last year's summit in Seattle. I did a presentation on dynamic security
> there.
>
> 2) http access is a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition feature.
>
> --
> Dave Wickert [MSFT]
> dwickert@online.microsoft.com
> Program Manager
> BI SystemsTeam
> SQL BI Product Unit (Analysis Services)
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>
> "Shanmugavel" <shanmugavel@rsi.ramco.com> wrote in message
> news:04D18CC4-C06A-4A0F-A4D7-37678EAD69A2@microsoft.com...
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1. We are using Microsoft Analysis Services 2000 for BI solutions to one
> of
>> our customer
>> 2. They have extensive security requirements for about 700 cube roles.
> They
>> also need 200 concurrent users.
>> 3. We have used OLAP cube based security and created cube roles and
> assigned
>> the dimension security using analysis services.
>> 4. We have tested the solution for 20 cube roles and three concurrent
> users.
>> It worked fine for that.
>> 5. We have to apply the dimension security for 3 dimensions, and each
>> dimension having 3 levels of hierarchy.
>> 6. We also need to enable Visual Totals. The subtotal should indicate the
>> total of only the visible rows.
>> 7. For each cube role, we have created one ADSI user. We can't escape
>> from
>> 700 ADSI users, since we have one to one mapping from 700 users to 700
> roles.
>> We are connecting with the ADSI user with HTTP URL to Analysis services
>> database.
>>
>>
>> Questions
>>
>> 1. Whether Microsoft analysis services can handle 700 cube roles,
>> security
>> and 200 concurrent users?
>> 2. What kind of license issues will arise for creating 700 cube roles ? (
>> Considering Point 7 )
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards,
>>
>> Shanmugavel
>
>
- Previous message: mark hill: "Re: QueryLog Question ?"
- In reply to: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Load and Concurrency"
- Next in thread: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Load and Concurrency"
- Reply: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Load and Concurrency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|