Re: Installation Question
From: Attila (Attila_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/12/04
- Next message: alex: "urgent action required"
- Previous message: Bluetooth: "Re: Large writebacks problems"
- In reply to: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Installation Question"
- Next in thread: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Installation Question"
- Reply: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Installation Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:55:01 -0700
Dave,
What is the recommended server configuration for an organization that wishes to use all three applications in a production environment? Would it be best to have each application installed on a separate server?
Attila
"Dave Wickert [MSFT]" wrote:
> Each server application has its own resource allocation technique.
>
> Since you are looking to run all 3 in production on the same box, it might
> require by-hand allocation. For example, suppose you have 8GB of memory --
> you might want to allocate 3GB to the RDBMS, 2GB to Analysis Services; 2GB
> to Reporting Services (and don't forget at least 1GB for the OS and other
> related processes running on the box).
>
> For Analysis Services, if you use Analysis Manager and right-click on the
> server name, select "Properties..." and then look at the Environment tab you
> will see the high and low memory allocation which Analysis Services will
> use. This is virtual memory allocation, but unless you are willing to take a
> tremendous amount of page faults, it roughly maps to physical memory also.
> By default, Analysis Services is installed with high memory set to the
> amount of memory on the machine (up to 2GB) and low memory at 1/2 of that
> value. See the Analysis Services Operations Guide
> (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/anservog.msp
> x ) under the section "Configuration Management".
>
> The SQL Server RDBMS will, by default, attempt to allocate all physical
> memory that it can -- and then back off if the computer page fault rate goes
> too high. It keeps backing off until the system stabalizes. While this is OK
> for an interactive computer, it isn't good if you are using other server
> applications on the same box as this takes time and is variable over when it
> runs. So in that case you might decide to tune the RDBMS memory allocation
> by-hand. This means setting the memory options maually,see BOL under the
> topic "Server Memory Options" for a detailed discussion of how to do this
> and the implications.
>
> Reporting Services as a web service uses memory allocation based on its IIS
> virtual directory and the IIS web site that it is running under.
>
> --
> Dave Wickert [MSFT]
> dwickert@online.microsoft.com
> Program Manager
> BI SystemsTeam
> SQL BI Product Unit (Analysis Services)
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
> "Attila" <Attila@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:B97CAB95-A8E8-4ACE-9FB4-10B9FE42A627@microsoft.com...
> > Dave,
> >
> > Thanks for the response. Can you elaborate on what you mean by getting the
> memory allocation right? How do I allocate memory to a specific application?
> >
> > Attila
> >
> >
> > "Dave Wickert [MSFT]" wrote:
> >
> > > There is no technical reason why not. I run it on my machines like that
> all
> > > of the time.
> > > It is just that in production you may have to spend some time getting
> your
> > > memory allocation right because all three can consume heavy amounts of
> > > memory and CPU from time to time (as they are server-based products).
> > > --
> > > Dave Wickert [MSFT]
> > > dwickert@online.microsoft.com
> > > Program Manager
> > > BI SystemsTeam
> > > SQL BI Product Unit (Analysis Services)
> > > --
> > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> > >
> > > "Attila" <Attila@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > > news:154D2F8A-F67B-4E3F-82C9-B4E20F8E2C1A@microsoft.com...
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking to install Analysis Services on a server that is running
> both
> > > SQL Server 2000 and Reporting Services. While I don't think this should
> > > cause any problems, I was hoping that others would comment based on
> their
> > > own experiences. Your input would be much appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Attila
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
- Next message: alex: "urgent action required"
- Previous message: Bluetooth: "Re: Large writebacks problems"
- In reply to: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Installation Question"
- Next in thread: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Installation Question"
- Reply: Dave Wickert [MSFT]: "Re: Installation Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|