Re: MSAS Licensing Part II
From: Dave Wickert [MSFT] (dwickert_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/10/04
- Next message: Jim: "RE: Calculated Member MDX syntax"
- Previous message: Joerg Narr: "Re: SAP BW compared to Essbase/SQLServer/Oracle as a Enterprise Data"
- In reply to: Caretaker: "Re: MSAS Licensing Part II"
- Next in thread: Caretaker: "Re: MSAS Licensing Part II"
- Reply: Caretaker: "Re: MSAS Licensing Part II"
- Reply: Caretaker: "Re: MSAS Licensing Part II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:30:49 -0500
I appreciate that it may not make any difference in your situation but that
is how the product is licensed and distributed (there is extra software on
the Enterprise Edition CD that you have to configure -- see BOL). If you
wish to use http access then you must have Enterprise Edition. Only in
Enterprise Edition is the code delivered which enables this feature. With
Standard Edition, the service only listens on one port (2725) and accepts
only direct connections from clients (using PTS).
The actual processing of Http access is a function of both the client and
the server. On the client-side, PTS looks at the server name. If the server
name does not start with the 7 characters "http://" then PTS makes a direct
connection to the Analysis server specified. If it does start with that,
then PTS assumes that the server name is really a URL and it appends
"/msolap.asp" to the end of it. It takes exactly the *same* buffers that it
would have sent in a direct client-server connection and wraps it in a
MIME-encoded block and does a HTTP post to that URL. This decision as to
what type of transport to use is done JUST before the message block is to be
sent to the server -- down deep inside PTS. All of this processing is
included in the PTS -- there is only one version of PTS. Standard Edition
and Enterprise Edition are the same. The differences between editions is
what the *server* is capable of accepting. This makes it easier for
resellers, small businesses such as yourself, and IT departments in large
enterprise customers to distribute client-side components.
On the server-side there is a big difference between http access and direct
client-server access. For direct client-server access, the Analysis service
is listening on port 2725 (for SQL Server 2000, there are other ports for
SQL 7 i.e 2393 and 2394). For http access, you must also have running IIS
and configure it properly to accept the request (e.g. establish a virtual
directory and configure it), and place the msolap.asp file on it. The
msolap.asp file takes the incoming data, decodes the MIME-encoded block and
passes it to the msmdpump.dll component which then passes it to the msmdsrv
service as if it was an incoming request was a direct connection. The data
pump then accepts the results back (again as if it was a direct connection),
MIME-encodes the block and pass it back to msolap.asp, when then passes it
back through IIS to PTS which decodes the MIME block and processes it as
normal. So as you can see -- you have lots more moving parts that -- when
all is over and done with -- just emulate a direct connection, but use http
as the transport mechanism.
You will note that all of this is totally transparent to the client. They
work with AS as they normally would. The *ONLY* difference is the format for
the server name. All other functions, properties, methods, etc. are totally
the same.
Hope that helps.
-- Dave Wickert [MS] dwickert@online.microsoft.com Program Manager BI Practices Team SQL BI Product Unit (Analysis Services) -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Caretaker" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:63454280-2470-4942-A7C6-410569E784E0@microsoft.com... > Dave, > > Thanks for the reply. There seems to be a perception that the use of HTTP automatically means that there will be delivery outside of the firewall, as you hinted to when you said that intranets usually don't use HTTP. HTTP is simply a protocol, and has nothing to do with whether delivery is made inside or out of the firewall. That said, the protocol should not matter when we are wanting to deliver within our firewall to a maximum of 30 users. And yes, we use HTTP as an intranet protocol. We should not be forced to spend such a significantly more amount of money going to EE just because we choose HTTP as the protocol. The bottom line is, we're delivering only inside our firewall to 30 users, so we should be able to use SE with the server and purchase the appropriate user or device CALs within SE, as is Microsoft's intent. In any case, where does the HTTP enabling and disabling exist - in the AS client, AS server, or some other layer such as IIS? Thus, if we use HTTP to attempt to deliver existing AS cubes, will SE disable HTTP so that no access method, whether OLE for OLAP or Cognos' access method to MSAS cubes through PowerPlay, will be able to deliver existing MSAS cubes to CAL-compliant users for reading? Does it make a difference whether we use IIS or something on the order of Tomcat for whether this disabling occurs? > > We want 30 CAL-compliant users to be able to read MSAS cubes from a properly licensed server with properly licensed CALs using SE. You say we can do this unless we use HTTP protocol. I say the protocol shouldn't determine the edition of SQL 2k we should have to purchase, especially with the huge, huge disparity in pricing. 30 users are 30 users, regardless of how cubes are delivered. Am I missing something?
- Next message: Jim: "RE: Calculated Member MDX syntax"
- Previous message: Joerg Narr: "Re: SAP BW compared to Essbase/SQLServer/Oracle as a Enterprise Data"
- In reply to: Caretaker: "Re: MSAS Licensing Part II"
- Next in thread: Caretaker: "Re: MSAS Licensing Part II"
- Reply: Caretaker: "Re: MSAS Licensing Part II"
- Reply: Caretaker: "Re: MSAS Licensing Part II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|