Re: dimensions and cube aggregs
From: Dave Wickert [MSFT] (dwickert_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/01/04
- Next message: J. Nathalia: "Calculated member part of a hierarchy"
- Previous message: Sean Boon [MS]: "Re: DSO and ASP.NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:44:22 -0500
You might consider looking at the Analysis Services Performance Guide.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/ansvcspg.mspx
It discusses all of your alternatives in a tremendous amount of detail and
with examples.
-- Dave Wickert [MS] dwickert@online.microsoft.com Program Manager BI Practices Team SQL BI Product Unit (Analysis Services) -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "PCH" <pch12@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:eMVYp3K$DHA.2664@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > I'm trying to simplify my cube processing system. > > I have 8 dimensions that are needed for various queries. 5 are > shared/static, and 3 are private that must process daily. > > I am trying to use them all in 1 cube, instead of 4-6 cubes. > > The problem is the aggregations get a bit out of hand even at 20%. > > 4 of the dimensions do not need to relate to each other, and 3 dimensions > form the base of the cube (time, customer, etc etc) > > Is there a way to force what combination the aggregations will use? Perhaps > using the Usage-Based_Optimization? Ie dont aggregate dimension A to > dimension B.. > > Thanks. > > >
- Next message: J. Nathalia: "Calculated member part of a hierarchy"
- Previous message: Sean Boon [MS]: "Re: DSO and ASP.NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading