Re: Linking Tables Problem, Access vs SQL 2005
- From: "Russell Fields" <russellfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:31:21 -0400
Is it always the same tables that you get? Always the same number of tables? Are they the first 40-50% in name order, object id order, et cetera? Any kind of pattern?
One thing to know is that security is different in SQL Server 2005. In SQL Server 2000 you would be able to see metadata on all the tables in a database to which you had access. In SQL Server 2005 you (by default) can only see metadata for tables to which you have some rights. If this is the problem, then you can restore access to the metadata by:
USE DatabaseName
GRANT VIEW DEFINITION TO [Domain\Login]
This removes the metadata restriction in that database.
RLF
"bugerr" <bugerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:2AF267B9-CA57-4E02-9D98-825A5360365C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
I've a sql server 2005 database, with 60.000 tables. I need links these
tables to a access file throught odbc. If i link these with the odbc to a sql
server 2000 i obtain the 100% of tables. But with the link is with sql 2005 i
only obtain the 40-50% of the tables. I've tried play with the odbc
parammeters, but nothing happens. Other theme is that with the same odbc
driver if i link from excell, obtain a perfect 100%. So i dont know if the
problem is access, the odbc connection, any configuration of sql server
2005...
The sql native driver version is: 2005.90.4035.00
Any idea?. THX
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linking Tables Problem, Access vs SQL 2005
- From: bugerr
- Re: Linking Tables Problem, Access vs SQL 2005
- References:
- Linking Tables Problem, Access vs SQL 2005
- From: bugerr
- Linking Tables Problem, Access vs SQL 2005
- Prev by Date: Linking Tables Problem, Access vs SQL 2005
- Next by Date: Re: Linking Tables Problem, Access vs SQL 2005
- Previous by thread: Linking Tables Problem, Access vs SQL 2005
- Next by thread: Re: Linking Tables Problem, Access vs SQL 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|