RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- From: wread@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Warren Read)
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:53:51 GMT
Try microsoft.public.sqlserver.jdbcdriver
Perhaps someone on this alias can address your question.
Good luck!
--------------------
| Thread-Topic: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
| thread-index: AcWujdAXO+ZlWwwzSwq0xDayA4RnlA==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 199.181.134.212
| From: "=?Utf-8?B?TWljaGFlbFc=?=" <MichaelW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| References: <FC25F063-3ECA-42A7-9095-642ECCDB8CBC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<sBlO1worFHA.1204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Subject: RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
| Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:40:55 -0700
| Lines: 41
| Message-ID: <29F51F66-4E80-452C-B2CC-D27A28063A20@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc:2648
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc
|
| I'm not seeing a JDBC section on here. Using non Microsoft JDBC
connectiong
| to SQL server.
|
| "Warren Read" wrote:
|
| > This doesn't appear to be an ODBC issue. Perhaps if you can't get a
| > response in this alias you could try a Java or JDBC alias?
| > --------------------
| > | Thread-Topic: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
| > | thread-index: AcWsS/nqoR9CPWgEQMKylP56fG3lXw==
| > | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 199.181.134.212
| > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?TWljaGFlbFc=?=" <MichaelW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | Subject: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
| > | Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:44:36 -0700
| > | Lines: 6
| > | Message-ID: <FC25F063-3ECA-42A7-9095-642ECCDB8CBC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | MIME-Version: 1.0
| > | Content-Type: text/plain;
| > | charset="Utf-8"
| > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| > | Importance: normal
| > | Priority: normal
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc:2628
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc
| > |
| > | I have a java developer using a connection setting of
| > | Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE to our SQL Server. How does this
| > | connection setting interact with the code it touches? If it calls a
| > stored
| > | procedure that is using a nolock hint will it ignore it?
| > |
| > | Thank!
| > |
| >
| >
|
.
- References:
- RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- From: Warren Read
- RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- From: MichaelW
- RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- Prev by Date: RE: JDBC - Can't get unicode with ResultSet.getString()
- Next by Date: Re: Access connection to SQL shows as system account in SQL Monito
- Previous by thread: RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- Next by thread: RE: Login failed for user 'sa' on MSDE re-installation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
