RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- From: "MichaelW" <MichaelW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:40:55 -0700
I'm not seeing a JDBC section on here. Using non Microsoft JDBC connectiong
to SQL server.
"Warren Read" wrote:
> This doesn't appear to be an ODBC issue. Perhaps if you can't get a
> response in this alias you could try a Java or JDBC alias?
> --------------------
> | Thread-Topic: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
> | thread-index: AcWsS/nqoR9CPWgEQMKylP56fG3lXw==
> | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 199.181.134.212
> | From: "=?Utf-8?B?TWljaGFlbFc=?=" <MichaelW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | Subject: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
> | Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:44:36 -0700
> | Lines: 6
> | Message-ID: <FC25F063-3ECA-42A7-9095-642ECCDB8CBC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | MIME-Version: 1.0
> | Content-Type: text/plain;
> | charset="Utf-8"
> | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> | Importance: normal
> | Priority: normal
> | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc
> | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
> | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc:2628
> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc
> |
> | I have a java developer using a connection setting of
> | Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE to our SQL Server. How does this
> | connection setting interact with the code it touches? If it calls a
> stored
> | procedure that is using a nolock hint will it ignore it?
> |
> | Thank!
> |
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- From: Warren Read
- RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- References:
- RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- From: Warren Read
- RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- Prev by Date: RE: how to write query
- Next by Date: RE: Access Connection
- Previous by thread: RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- Next by thread: RE: Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|