Re: 2GB Limitation question
From: Stephen Dybing [MSFT] (stephd_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/16/04
- Next message: Stephen Dybing [MSFT]: "Re: xp_sendMail"
- Previous message: Stephen Dybing [MSFT]: "Re: xp_sendMail"
- In reply to: Richard Yeo: "RE: 2GB Limitation question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:26:31 -0700
Uh no, the log file size does not factor into that 2GB database limitation.
When the rows are deleted from your table, they are gone and new rows can
use that space. SHRINK is still not necessary for this situation and if
performance is an issue, please remember that shrinking and growing the file
is expensive. It's possible that SHRINK is necessary in some situations for
some people, but I think it's highly overrated.
-- Sincerely, Stephen Dybing This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Richard Yeo" <RichardYeo@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:55CC05A1-238C-4FB3-A117-466C3A6F0570@microsoft.com... > So SHRINK is important ;) > Sorry just pulling Stephens leg I knew this all along. > MSDE is often used as a log and therefore lots of deletes will be used > when > the old log information is no longer required. Therefore shrink is > important. > > Don't forget to backup your transaction logs regularly to prevent them > growing continuously. > > You should also consider running an integrity check regularly. > > Rich > > "Jack T." wrote: > >> Is the 2 GB limitation the combination of the .MDF and .LDF or only the >> ..MDF? >> >> If both, can you turn off the LOG file? >> >> Thanks, >> Jack T. >> >> >>
- Next message: Stephen Dybing [MSFT]: "Re: xp_sendMail"
- Previous message: Stephen Dybing [MSFT]: "Re: xp_sendMail"
- In reply to: Richard Yeo: "RE: 2GB Limitation question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|