Re: Noise Words
- From: toddwprice@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:55:49 -0000
Sorry - to clarify, it is SQL 2005. My understanding is that the
noise words should be removed automatically.
Anyone?
On Oct 2, 10:10 pm, "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cot...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not in SQL 2000. It bombs on this message. You will have to trim this noise
word out from your query or remove it from your noise word list.
--
RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTShttp://www.indexserverfaq.com<toddwpr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1191362145.406220.303090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This query returns several rows:
SELECT *
FROM ContainsTable(Article, *, '"Working" AND "Women" AND "Healthy"')
But this one returns none:
SELECT *
FROM ContainsTable(Article, *, '"Working" AND "Women" AND "Healthy"
AND "Are"')
I get the informational 'The full-text search condition contained
noise word(s).' on the second query, so the word "Are" must be in the
noise words file.
My question is this: if "Are" is a noise word, why does it affect my
query results? Shouldn't I get the exact same number of results for
each query?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Noise Words
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: Noise Words
- References:
- Noise Words
- From: toddwprice
- Re: Noise Words
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Noise Words
- Prev by Date: msftesql.exe uses 100% on all CPUs
- Next by Date: Re: msftesql.exe uses 100% on all CPUs
- Previous by thread: Re: Noise Words
- Next by thread: Re: Noise Words
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading