Re: Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- From: "Brian" <TargetedConvergence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:24:08 -0500
"denistc" <denistc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:64C9346C-881C-4FC5-928C-1C7751ACECA6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
have you tried storying your WordML files in an a column of type XML? That
should invoke the XML filter.
Yes, though we've had trouble with some WordML files being rejected.
We've narrowed the issue on that front... any WordML file that has "UTF-8"
in the docheader gets rejected... not sure why though. Also not sure why
Word is creating some files with that encoding. Simply removing the tag
from the docheader (without any other re-encoding) seems to work fine, oddly
enough.
We're a bit nervous to move to the XML column until we understand what
conditions might cause XML to reject a WordML doc coming out of Word...
because without that understanding, we can't be sure it won't happen to our
customers.
Thanks for the suggestion,
Brian
.
- References:
- Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- From: Brian
- Re: Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- From: Brian
- Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- Prev by Date: RE: full-text search failed with one million of key words (Sqlserv
- Next by Date: Noise File.
- Previous by thread: Re: Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- Next by thread: Re: Does indexing on IMAGE fields work?
- Index(es):