Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- From: "Brian" <TargetedConvergence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:26:43 -0500
We currently are saving WordML (Word 2003's XML format rather than binary
format) docs into a column of our SQL Server 2005 database and full text
indexing on it. Works okay, but not great. For example, all the XML tags
are indexed... so you find many words that are not in the document (from the
user persepctive).
The fix for that is clear... use an XML filter. (Though how to do that is
not so clear... we tried moving the WordML from a Text column to an XML
column, but it gives errors on illegal characters in the Word doc.)
However, it would seem that even an XML filter will not do nearly as well as
a filter designed for WordML.
Can anyone point me to a WordML full-text-search filter for SQL Server
2005??
Thanks,
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems with long execution time
- Next by Date: Re: Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- Previous by thread: Re: Problems with long execution time
- Next by thread: Re: Filter for WordML vs Filter for XML vs Filter for Text
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|