Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- From: "Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:24:13 -0500
I added a Office nvchar(8) column and populated it.
No matter what I specify for a search condition, it doesn't return what I'm
after.
For a test I tried
select count(DocumentID) from Document where contains(*, 'Office02 and
cobol')
'Office02' is in the new column, 'cobol' is in the image column.
If I search for them seperately there is overlap so the data is correct.
Ideas?
"Lakusha" <Lakusha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uWBdE0KJHHA.3552@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Kyle,
a) you can create an index on a view if you use VARCHAR(MAX) or
VARBINARY(MAX) instead of TEXT or IMAGE (which are deprecated in sql
2005).
b) AFAIK, those "tokens" can be other columns from the same view/table
that are also indexed in that FT catalog. You just specify CONTAINS(*,...
Instead of CONTAINS(MyClobColumn,...
it should work.
"Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23vIoXwFJHHA.536@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Looks like I'm stuck.
In order to create a Full Text Index on my view, the view has to have a
unique index.
SQL 2005 doesn't allow you to create a index on a view if the view
contains an text, ntext, image or xml columns.
And mine does because we're storint the resume in an image column and the
resume is what we're after.
We can't add any special tokens, the content is an image field.
Any other ideas?
"Simon Sabin" <SimonSabin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:62959f1a36ede8c8edf7abdbb584@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Kyle,
The other option is to add the office ID to the content (If the content
was editable i.e. text/html)
Then use a query like containstable(document, content,'OFFICE2345 AND
"SQL SERVER DBA"')
If the content is editabel this is by far the more manageable, and
scalable.
We did the index view thing and it is just not a neat solution. The
token thing is much easier.
Simon Sabin
SQL Server MVP
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/simons
I think I found my answer...although a lot of work.
Remove the FTI from the table.
Add an OfficeID column to the table and populate it.
Partition the table by the OfficeID column.
Create an Indexed View for each OfficeID
(Open a new office, the add a new OfficeID and a new Indexed View for
that
OfficeID.)
(Close an existing Office, migrate the documents to a different
office, drop
the FTI for that View and drop that View)
Add a FTI to each of the Indexed Views.
Mod the application so it knows what how to FT search one or more
Indexed Views and combine the results from multiple views if needed.
"Kyle Jedrusiak" <kjedrusiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:OitVbpuHHHA.1468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We have this table...
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Document](
[DocumentID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[HumanResourceID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Name] [nvarchar](256) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[Description] [nvarchar](256) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
NOT
NULL,
[ContentType] [nchar](4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT
NULL,
[Content] [image] NOT NULL,
[DateEntered] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[DateModified] [datetime] NULL,
[Version] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
[EmployeeID] [int] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [Resume_PK] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ResumeID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, FILLFACTOR = 90) ON
[PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
Content contains the bits that make up either Word or RTF documents.
We have FTI defined on Content / ContentType / DocumentID. Generally
FT searches are working.
The table contains over 130k documents.
Through our application we are limiting their searches to the top
1500 rank of any FT search. (So as not to over-burden our server.)
This works when the want to search the table for documents within the
entire company.
But what they would really like is the top 1500 rank for documents
within their office.
Is there a way to partition the the table by an OfficeID with some
what to pre-filter so the FT search is only looking at Documents from
one or more OfficeIDs?
TIA - Kyle!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- From: Kyle Jedrusiak
- Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- References:
- Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- From: Kyle Jedrusiak
- Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- From: Simon Sabin
- Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- From: Kyle Jedrusiak
- Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- From: Lakusha
- Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- Prev by Date: Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- Next by Date: Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- Previous by thread: Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- Next by thread: Re: FTI, Searching and other Filters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|