Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: "Bahama Joe" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:12:44 -0500
Hello Simon,
This is a new SQL install. I just created the table, loaded it with all 20
million rows from a text file via "Import data...", then created the
full-text index (which took about 2 hours). My table basically includes an
"int" primary key (clustered index) column and a "text" column with the text
to be indexed. The table also includes 2 other "text" fields, but they're
not involved in these queries. The result is a database .MDF file of approx.
12GB and a full-text index with files of approx. 2GB, with the full-text
index containing approx. 1.4 million unique keys.
When I look at task manager for memory usage, I see the following:
sqlservr.exe --> mem usage=740MB, VM size=749MB
msftesql.exe --> mem usage=7.6MB, VM size=5MB
Right after a reboot, these numbers are continually rising, but after a
number of queries, these numbers steady out to the ones listed above. Based
on this, would you recommend that I change my memory configuration?
Thanks.
.
- References:
- Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: Bahama Joe
- Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: Simon Sabin
- Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- Next by Date: Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- Next by thread: Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|