Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: "Bahama Joe" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:42:28 -0500
Hilary,
Here is the result of that query:
name=max server memory (MB)
minimum=16
maximum=2147483647
config_value=4096
run_value=4096
Is that configured correctly for a server w/ 2GB of physical RAM?
Also, in one of your earlier posts, you mentioned setting "max full-text
crawl range" to the number of CPU's on the system. I have a dual-core Xeon
processor, meaning it has 2 CPU's (in one chip). However, due to Hyper
Threading, Windows and SQL Server see this server as having 4 CPU's, so I
have that value set to 4. Is that a good setting?
All of my tests have been on just the single table that contains my
full-text index, such as "select ItemID from Item where
contains(ItemText,'"George Bush"')", so there are no other tables involved.
Thanks for all of your insightful replies.
.
- References:
- FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: Bahama Joe
- Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: Bahama Joe
- Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: Bahama Joe
- Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- From: Hilary Cotter
- FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: nvarchar max
- Next by Date: Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- Next by thread: Re: FTS query performance on SQL 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|