Re: Strange behavior of CONTAINS function
- From: "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:47:10 -0400
You can use the neutral one. There will be minimal performance effects by
using the neutral word breaker over the Dutch one. I know for some languages
it is important, like German. I did spend some time in Beverwyck, and my
father was fluent in Africaans, however my knowledge of spoken and written
Dutch is limited to a few words and phrases so I can't really comment on it.
I'll ask Hugo Kornelius, SQL MVP to weigh in on this.
--
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Pim75" <p.megens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1157461512.679277.302730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Hilary,
Thanks for your reply!
Indeed the search for PDP* returns the correct records.
Do you know if it's possible to turn of the Dutch word breaker? Or has
this any negative effects on performance?
regards,
Pim
.
- References:
- Strange behavior of CONTAINS function
- From: Pim75
- Re: Strange behavior of CONTAINS function
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: Strange behavior of CONTAINS function
- From: Pim75
- Strange behavior of CONTAINS function
- Prev by Date: Re: Strange behavior of CONTAINS function
- Next by Date: Performance issue with CONTAINS
- Previous by thread: Re: Strange behavior of CONTAINS function
- Next by thread: Re: Strange behavior of CONTAINS function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading