Re: Weight returning unexpected results
- From: matthewehoward@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Oct 2005 08:23:18 -0700
John, thanks for your reply. I have 300,000+ rows in the address table,
although now I just ran the same query and I'm getting the results I
was expecting. I'm pretty sure it was re-populating the index when I
was doing my initial testing, so perhaps SQL Server updates statistics
after each population that it needs to determine the rank?
I'll see if I can find anything in the BOL, but it does seem much
better now.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Weight returning unexpected results
- From: John Kane
- Re: Weight returning unexpected results
- References:
- Weight returning unexpected results
- From: matthewehoward
- Re: Weight returning unexpected results
- From: John Kane
- Weight returning unexpected results
- Prev by Date: Re: can i/should i worry about fragmentation in catalog files?
- Next by Date: Re: can i/should i worry about fragmentation in catalog files?
- Previous by thread: Re: Weight returning unexpected results
- Next by thread: Re: Weight returning unexpected results
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading