Re: Full Text Search Performance
From: Ali Salem (AliSalem_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/24/04
- Next message: Ali Salem: "Re: Full Text Search Performance"
- Previous message: John Kane: "Re: Filter Html tags on Full text Search"
- In reply to: John Kane: "Re: Full Text Search Performance"
- Next in thread: John Kane: "Re: Full Text Search Performance"
- Reply: John Kane: "Re: Full Text Search Performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:33:02 -0700
Thanks a lot for you prompt answers. Below is the script result you
requested. The database is on drive E on the production, the fulll text
catalogs are on drive L, which is also on the SAN.
Please finde below my comments on your points:
1) The Arabic language columns, Yes, these columns contains arabic text.
However, we are using neutral for FT. Arabic word breaker can follow the same
rules as english one, and I am not sure this might cause i problem in
performance, I have some doubts about this. the only think that i think is
important here is that arabic uses unicode here, so text size is twice! Also,
I am not getting arabic seach slower than english in a reasonable way, I can
understand a loss of 5-10% in performance for such a thing but not to get a
system that is 50 times slower for the simplest query that does not have much
linguistic as this is not being apllie don arabic by sql FT. The query that
should perform in sub second, is taking 30 or 40 seconds this is too much to
the point that I cannot understand it.
2) The drive letter that is used by the database is E, The FT catalgo are on
another SAN Partition and that is frive E. I think this should make
performance even better.
3) Resource Usage, I can try to set to level 5, but how much difference this
will show, I mean can it be the reason for such a poor query performance! or
it should improve the performance by 10% or so?
Also, I have read something about configuring SQL to use a fixed memory on
the server and leave at max 512 MB for mssearch, does setting the resource
usage flag to 5 substitutes the fixed sql server memory idea? or it is
something that i need to do in adition to that?
Thanks a lot for you help and support. i really appreciate it.
thank you,
Ali Salem
name
db_size owner
dbid created status
compatibility_level
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ -----------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------
testdb
148399.88 MB
tstdmn\sysadmin
19 Oct 14 2004
Status=ONLINE, Updateability=READ_WRITE, UserAccess=MULTI_USER,
Recovery=BULK_LOGGED, Version=539, Collation=Arabic_CI_AS, SQLSortOrder=0,
IsTornPageDetectionEnabled, IsAutoCreateStatistics, IsAutoUpdateStatistics,
IsFullTextEnabled
80
name
fileid filename
filegroup
size
maxsize growth usage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ---------
testdbSYS
1
E:\E_DataBase\testdbSYS_Data.MDF
PRIMARY
10112 KB Unlimited 10% data only
testdb_Log
2
E:\E_DataBase\testdb_Log.LDF
NULL
51200000 KB Unlimited 10% log only
testdb1
3
E:\E_DataBase\testdb_INDEXES_Data.NDF
SECONDARY1
9216000 KB Unlimited 10% data only
testdb2
4
E:\E_DataBase\testdb_MAIN_Data.NDF
SECONDARY2
40960000 KB Unlimited 10% data only
testdb3
5
E:\E_DataBase\testdb_IMAGES_Data.NDF
SECONDARY3
39424000 KB Unlimited 10% data only
testdb4
6
E:\E_DataBase\testdb_ALL_Data.NDF
SECONDARY4
11151360 KB Unlimited 10% data only
- Next message: Ali Salem: "Re: Full Text Search Performance"
- Previous message: John Kane: "Re: Filter Html tags on Full text Search"
- In reply to: John Kane: "Re: Full Text Search Performance"
- Next in thread: John Kane: "Re: Full Text Search Performance"
- Reply: John Kane: "Re: Full Text Search Performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|