Re: Sample ETL Advice
- From: Allan Mitchell <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:44:01 -0800
Hello imani_technology_spam@xxxxxxxxx,
I am saying that TSQL will pound for pound be the best option but it may not be the best thing if you want complex scrubbing. Keep it simple. SSIS is a hammer but not everything is a nail.
TSQL is very very performant when used properly and well. SSIS is likewise.
Allan
That's very interesting. Again, we found that it was much more
efficient and flexible to use T-SQL within stored procedures to
complete our ETL tasks when the source and destination are both SQL
Server 2000. Can I assume that approach might not be necessary with
SQL Server 2005 or that SSIS can get the job done more efficiently
that stored procedures?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sample ETL Advice
- From: imani_technology_spam
- Re: Sample ETL Advice
- References:
- Re: Sample ETL Advice
- From: imani_technology_spam
- Re: Sample ETL Advice
- Prev by Date: Re: DTS transfer from Paradox to SQL Server 2000 using SQL Agent
- Next by Date: migrate + convert data from old to new db structure in SQL 2000 with DTS
- Previous by thread: Re: Sample ETL Advice
- Next by thread: Re: Sample ETL Advice
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|