Re: Normalized Data base
- From: "Peter Nolan" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Jul 2005 08:19:52 -0700
Hi Lina,
if you go to my downloads page on www.peternolan.com there are some
presentations, one of which is about data modeling and some newsletters
one of which is about data modeling.
There is something of a 'reglious' debate over modeling techniques in
DWing that has been going on for many years. I put my public opinion on
my FAQs page....
Current 'best practice' of publicly available information is to have an
archive layer in 3NF + Time variant model (plus stability analysis if
you need it) as well as an analytical later (dimensional). This is also
the most expensive practice........not everyone needs an archive layer
as described here...
The 'next generation' models I work with make the separate archive
layer redundant...I've written on this topic many times and the posts
are archived on http://www.datawarehousing.com/list.asp.
Best Regards
Peter Nolan
www.peternolan.com
.
- References:
- Normalized Data base
- From: Lina Manjarres
- Re: Normalized Data base
- From: JT
- Normalized Data base
- Prev by Date: Re: Can I pick your brains for a second? transferring a large database problem.
- Next by Date: Re: how is checksum calculated?
- Previous by thread: Re: Normalized Data base
- Next by thread: Front End
- Index(es):
Loading