Discussion: How to determine a Fact Table algorithmically
From: Girish (gbajaj_at_tietronixinc.com)
Date: 03/03/04
- Previous message: Sal Cincotta: "Re: 64-bit performance vs 32-bit performance"
- Next in thread: Vikrant V Dalwale [MSFT]: "RE: Discussion: How to determine a Fact Table algorithmically"
- Reply: Vikrant V Dalwale [MSFT]: "RE: Discussion: How to determine a Fact Table algorithmically"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:35:37 -0600
I dont know the difference between OLAP and the datawarehouse newsgroups,
and i really dont know how many ppl frequent both the groups together - but
Im posting this topic here in hopes that it may start a discussion. I
apologies for any inconvenience. Thks. =)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Everyone knows what fact tables are. Everyone knows that you need some kind of application domain expert to identify the fact tables in a relational database so that you can eventually build a cube around it. A domain expert would also probably identify the dimension tables as well as any measures. Anyways, so heres my question - and it came up after looking at sql yukons new one-click cube feature - It seems (to me) pretty magical that you can algorithmically determine what a fact table is and its corresponding dimension tables are by just analyzing the database schema (note the word schema and not data!). In order to unveil the magic (cause I know its really not! :-) ), I have taken it up upon myself to determine what this algorithm could be. Can anyone take a crack at this algorithm? Heres my initial attempt - but its not good enough. POTENTIAL FACT TABLES -------------------------------- 1) Locate all Tables in database (and lets just stick with one db for now) that have a foreign key constraint on them. 2) Locate all Tables that are alone and not connected to any other tables. My simple algo for now gets more fact tables than yukons one-click cube feature. I did this test with the northwind database. If you want - I can post what fact and dimension tables yukon analysis server came up with. Should be a interesting and thought provoking discussion dont you think? :-) Unless the answer is so bloody simple that I cant see it cause im daft. But I think not - cause if it were simple - wouldnt MS have included this feature earlier on? :D And then also think about all the bad database designs out there that you would probably need to consider as well right! To add another twist - what about fact tables that are horizontally or vertically partitioned? Can an algorithm detect this as well? Or is manual the only way this can be done? thanks, girish
- Previous message: Sal Cincotta: "Re: 64-bit performance vs 32-bit performance"
- Next in thread: Vikrant V Dalwale [MSFT]: "RE: Discussion: How to determine a Fact Table algorithmically"
- Reply: Vikrant V Dalwale [MSFT]: "RE: Discussion: How to determine a Fact Table algorithmically"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|