Slow Windows Authentication vs Fast SQL Authentication



When I run: osql -S 192.168.1.xxx -E -Q "sp_who2" it takes 47 seconds.
When I run: osql -S 192.168.1.xxx -U test -P password -Q "sp_who2" it takes
1 second.

The client is a web server that is in the DMZ connecting to a SQL 2000
server that is behind a firewall (NetScreen I believe) that only has TCP
port 1433 open and is doing NAT.

Any idea why Windows Authentication is so much slower than SQL
Authentication?

Thanks

Branden

jaw_2k@xxxxxxxxx


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Slow Windows Authentication vs Fast SQL Authentication
    ... added a host entry and everything is better now. ... The client is a web server that is in the DMZ connecting to a SQL 2000 ... Any idea why Windows Authentication is so much slower than SQL ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.connect)
  • Suggestions on hardening a web server
    ... I was looking for some advice on hardening a web server that will host ASP ... pages and connect to a SQL Server 7 machine. ... firewall and the SQL box will be inside the firewall. ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
  • Re: New web server design with SQL back-end
    ... >>Is this setup more secure, in the sense that the SQL is on a separate box ... I would have placed the webserver outside of the firewall. ... be enough at the front end of the web server? ... Then using a Cisco Pix firewall to hide the SQL server behind. ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis)
  • Re: encrypt server data
    ... I guess you need to set 'vpn' for the sql and web server. ... > to a SQL server that is on the internal LAN behind a firewall. ... > that NAT and Ipsec have problems coexisting. ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
  • Re: where to put SQL Server ?
    ... > Unless you need to access the SQL Server from inside the firewall, ... > put both the web server, and the SQL Server on the outside. ... put the web server in there. ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)

Loading