Re: Truly High Available?
- From: "Geoff N. Hiten" <SQLCraftsman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:46:08 -0400
Clustering, in and of itself, won't give you a geographically dispersed Highly Available Solution.
SQL 2005 offers Mirroring, which allows for a second system with automatic failover. There are also some third-party solutions that allow for geographically dispersed clusters. It is important to learn about the requirements and the capabilities of each technology to see what it can and cannot protect against. HA is not a technology-only solution. It requires People and Process to make it happen.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"acmcdba68" <acmcdba68@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:B923F632-D8F9-43F1-A175-B20019259C89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a scenerio where I must implement a Highly Available environment
between two locations seperated by 25 miles.
The premise is to create a solution that will keep our application up and
running if our main location were hit by a tornado, an auto failover would
take place to the remote location.
If using a Microsoft Clustered solution, how is it truly 'HA' if there is a
shared disk sub-system? If there is a tornado in Loc 'A' and the shared disk
resides there, what have I accomplished? The same goes for Loc 'B'?
Maybe I'm reading more into it but would like someone to shed some light on
this.
--
Anthony E. Castro
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Truly High Available?
- Next by Date: Re: Choosing correct high availability setup
- Previous by thread: Re: Truly High Available?
- Next by thread: Re: Truly High Available?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|