Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- From: "Kevin3NF" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:08:12 -0600
The nodes are about 3 months old. Not sure about the SAN. This place
leases hardware IIRC, so that would not be an issue.
Testing the restore is of course part of the plan :) but I always appreciate
the reminder...
Still hoping to see if anyone has direct experience with imaging the nodes
of the cluster and usnig that image as a restore....
--
Kevin Hill
3NF Consulting
http://www.3nf-inc.com/NewsGroups.htm
Real-world stuff I run across with SQL Server:
http://kevin3nf.blogspot.com
"Edwin vMierlo" <EdwinvMierlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eubG506OHHA.3268@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree, I am not a big fan of upgrading clusters either, but I realise
sometimes there is no choice.
Ensure you have a *proven* backup and restore procedure, and backup prior
to
your upgrade.
(*proven* = actually tested, else you might be in for a disaster)
Is your hardware still under warrantee / support ?
And for how long ?
( it might be time to think of building a new cluster with new
hardware... )
"Geoff N. Hiten" <SQLCraftsman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u3hdLb2OHHA.4104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have never been a big fan of a cluster upgrade. The rollback planhe
basically becomes uninstall, reinstall, reload from backup. As a safety
measure, I would detach the user databases, upgrade in place, and then
attach. That way, if there is a failure in the upgrade process, you at
least save the restore step.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Kevin3NF" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uF8ZqejOHHA.1240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
New instance requires disk resources. I don't have disk resources
available. Or is 2005 that much different...
--
Kevin Hill
3NF Consulting
http://www.3nf-inc.com/NewsGroups.htm
Real-world stuff I run across with SQL Server:
http://kevin3nf.blogspot.com
"Zekske" <Zekske@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:14036779-7155-491E-AEB6-E431A07E05BF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Never did a cluster upgrade yet but I can tell you that images of
clusternodes work.
What you also can do is install SQL 2005 as a new instance aside your
SQL2000.
Then you can migrate your database from 2000 to 2005 keeping your old
databases as rollback and without the need of new hardware
"Kevin3NF" wrote:
Gentlemen, geniuses, either or both....
My client has a multi-instance SQL 2000 SP3 (.818) cluster on Win2K3.
He wants to upgrade both instances to 2005. Cool.
No extra drives/luns/whatever the proper term is are available in the
SAN.
Am I stuck with an in place upgrade? I would have preferred to do a
side by
side and move the databases but the hardware just aint there.
In this situation, what you do from a "rollback" perspective in case
upgrade blows chunks and has to revert? For a standalone, I assume
imaging
software would work...would a cluster image work just as well?
2005 upgrades are something I just haven't touched yet...:(
Thanks!
--
Kevin Hill
3NF Consulting
http://www.3nf-inc.com/NewsGroups.htm
Real-world stuff I run across with SQL Server:
http://kevin3nf.blogspot.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- From: Anthony Thomas
- Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- References:
- Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- From: Kevin3NF
- Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- From: Kevin3NF
- Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- From: Edwin vMierlo
- Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- Next by Date: Re: Use all available processors ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- Next by thread: Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading