Re: I have question regarding active/active clustering
- From: "Edwin vMierlo" <EdwinvMierlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:41:32 -0000
in-line
"Iter" <Iter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DC6C50FC-DF66-4701-806A-D33B366FBE65@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I still got confused. From your explaination and that web site you gave tocan
me, I think active/active cluster is like RAC in oracle, that means they
share the resource
no
or load banlance
no
and a node can take over other node that
is failed when it is two nodes cluster.
yes
Active/passive cluster is like oracle
standby, right?
I think so, but I don't know oracle
Is active/active a real product or just a theory?
Active/Active is a configuration of failover clustering. You can run one
Virtual SQL Instance (think of an instance as a standalone server) on one
node, and run another Virtual SQL Instance on a second node. On two nodes
you are now running two SQL instances. Effectively the two instances are
exactly the same as running two seperate standalone SQL servers. The do not
share any resource, they do not load balance in anyway, each having a
different name, each having a different IP, each having there own databases.
does this explain it better to you ?
rgds,
Edwin.
Thanks.only
"Edwin vMierlo" wrote:
active / passive for SQL server for a two node cluster means you have
instance,one group with an SQL instance. Only one node is running this SQL
morethe other node is not running the SQL instance and is *standby* to take
ownership if a fail condition occurs on the node running.
active / active for SQL server for a two node cluster menas you have
least)than one group with SQL instances. All nodes in your cluster run (at
youone SQL instance. In case of a fail condition, all groups will go to the
surviving node, and this node will run all SQL instances. Therefore this
might have an impact on Performance, in such a setup you need to ensure
andscale your hardware to be able to take all resources and still have
acceptable performance.
There are many more definitions of active / passive and active /active,
tosome of them are confusing, and different people give different meaning
pleasethese terms. Probably better to talk about :
- 2 node cluster with 1 SQL instance or
- 2 node cluster with multiple SQL instances
For a Microsoft definition of active / passive and active / active,
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/8846a72b-0882-4a24-8eee-a768e52925281033.mspx?mfr=truesee :
active/passive?")(scroll down to the question "What is active/active verses
is
HTH,
_Edwin.
"Iter" <Iter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:84780791-D41C-4482-8E59-6C799157C32C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That means it should equivelant to standby in oracle right? also, what
doesdifferent betteen active/pasive and active/active? In active/active,
itsit
use log shipping same as active/pasive? Thanks.
"Edwin vMierlo" wrote:
Iter,
The answer is No (unfortunately)
Failover clustering is not like oracle RAC, an SQL Instance contains
ofown
databases and only runs on one of the nodes in your cluster. In case
modea
offlinefailover, there will be a disconnect of connections as cluster will
ownership tothe group (and therefore the applications/SQL) while moving the
Failoveranother node in the cluster.
You cannot have 2 instances running off the same databases/disks.
Clustering is a "shared nothing" cluster model.
rgds,
Edwin.
"Iter" <Iter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3E3EFAA9-84C3-40F9-83F8-7EA5CAECA99B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Guys,
I have question regarding active/active clustering. Is that this
connectioncan
use for load balance and server redundance that means the
keep
alive when one of node failed. Is it like oracle RAC? Thanks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: I have question regarding active/active clustering
- From: Edwin vMierlo
- Re: I have question regarding active/active clustering
- From: Edwin vMierlo
- Re: I have question regarding active/active clustering
- From: Iter
- Re: I have question regarding active/active clustering
- Prev by Date: Re: I have question regarding active/active clustering
- Next by Date: Re: I have question regarding active/active clustering
- Previous by thread: Re: I have question regarding active/active clustering
- Next by thread: Re: I have question regarding active/active clustering
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading