Re: Clustering Question...
- From: "Geoff N. Hiten" <SQLCraftsman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:37:45 -0500
Just to expand on what Rodney said, it is possible to create a cluster from existing equipment, but it is neither desirable nor supported. The potential disruption during the install and migration process will likely cause some unplanned downtime, which defeats the entire purpose of a cluster. It is best to start from a clean slate and migrate the data into the new system.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:ODTKVxJHHHA.4804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Clusters have built from the ground up. You can't make it a cluster after the install of SQL. Migrate to a new cluster, built from the ground up, that is the best option.
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
http://www.msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"Hassan" <Hassan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23PKJjfJHHHA.3872@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSay I have a current standalone SQL 2005 node that is SAN attached.
How can I get it clustered by adding a passive secondary node to it ? Can I do so ? Or do I have to setup an entirely 2 new clustered set of servers and move the database from the standalone server to it ?
I am trying to avoid buying 2 new servers and move the database across but would like to just add another node to the existing standalone server and get it clustered. If this is possible, how can I do it ?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clustering Question...
- From: Anthony Thomas
- Re: Clustering Question...
- References:
- Clustering Question...
- From: Hassan
- Re: Clustering Question...
- From: Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]
- Clustering Question...
- Prev by Date: Re: Change SQL Port doesnt change
- Next by Date: disk failure on cluster array
- Previous by thread: Re: Clustering Question...
- Next by thread: Re: Clustering Question...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading