Re: Cluster Resource replacing physical server
- From: "Bowulf" <bowulf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Dec 2006 16:16:40 -0800
Thanks for the reply. I had ensured with replmon that the 11 Domain
Controllers had all been synchronized with the each other, and that the
ADUC on each domain controller showed the computer as removed. The
entry was of course still present but tombstoned. I would hate to
think I would have to wait 90 days though.
ipconfig2 wrote:
Hi Bowulf
The reason for this could be that the changes in Active Directory isn't
replicated around to all Domain Controllers. You could initiate Force
Replication but if you are in an enterprise environment this could cost in
terms of bandwith. Hence when you delete the computer account and it's not
replicated you would get this message.
Any help?
"Bowulf" wrote:
We are replacing an existing SQL 2000 EE server with a clustered
resource by the same name. We have done this before, but are running
into an issue on this install. Here are the steps we have performed:
* Migrate databases as files
* Shut off original server
* Delete original computer account and replicate to all domain
controllers.
* Create cluster resource (third resource in this cluster)
We are having problems though with cluster recognizing the old server
account. We are getting Event ID 1210 on Clussvc on the install.
"Cluster resource 'SQL Network Name(ITSQLEE)' failed to go online
because its associated computer account (ITSQLEE) exists in Active
Directory and the Kerberos authentication is not enabled for the
resource. Client applications that are using Kerberos based
authentication (either directly or through the Negotiate security
package) will fail to authenticate when contacting a service by this
network name.
To bring the resource online, either enable Kerberos authentication or
delete the computer account."
In a prior event message, we get 1119 - Clussvc - Bad DNS Key. I have
tried this multiple times after waiting for Active directory to
synchronize and verifying with replmon. Any ideas? Thank you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cluster Resource replacing physical server
- From: Anthony Thomas
- Re: Cluster Resource replacing physical server
- References:
- Cluster Resource replacing physical server
- From: Bowulf
- Cluster Resource replacing physical server
- Prev by Date: Re: Can Windows 2003 Cluster Services recognize more than 4 NICs?
- Next by Date: Clustering Question...
- Previous by thread: Cluster Resource replacing physical server
- Next by thread: Re: Cluster Resource replacing physical server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading