Re: SQL Server High Availability/Fault Tolerance.
- From: "Edwin vMierlo" <EdwinvMierlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:47:39 -0000
Fully agree with Russ, explore the SQL2005 native features for high
availablility
One more, which you should look at (other than log-shipping and database
mirroring) is Replication.
Each one of those technologies have pro's and con's, it is a matter of
comparing and choosing the one which fits your business requirement and
budget.
rgds,
Edwin.
"Russ Kaufmann (MVP)" <russ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OWRzpX4DHHA.2356@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Sezgin" <anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagethe
news:%23ttfOwtDHHA.3444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
Currently we have the following setup:
2 Node Active/Passive SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Ed. Cluster,running on
Windows 2003 Enterprise Ed. Single production database,about 1.5 GB in
size,growing rate is about 150 MB per month.
The shared storage is on HP EVA 5000.The 2 servers and SAN are all in
andsame room.
Both hardware and software upgrade are planned for the near future. Key
points are High Availability and Fault Tolerance.
SQL Server 2005 Standard or Enterprise Edition is considered as the DB
software because large portion of the business logic is implemented in
complex Stored Procedures,making use of T-SQL.
After the upgrade 2 separate buildings will be used. At each location we
are planning to have 1 SAN and 2 SAN switches,servers, tape libraries
haveEthernet switches. SAN and Ethernet switches in the 2 buildings will
choiceconnections between them,the distance is about 100 metres. Possible
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/maintain/optimize/geoclust.mspxfor SAN is the NetApp FAS 3050C model,which is advertised to have
software solutions for copying data between SAN's.
I am doing a research on the High Availability/Fault Tolerance/Disaster
Recovery solutions for the SQL Server database.
Is there any solution providing automatic Failover even in the event of
complete SAN failure(for exapmle in the event of fire or earthquake)
,assuming that we have 1 SQL Server and SAN in each buiding and 1 of the
buildings remains intact ?
With SQL, you can use Geo Clustering, as discussed by Edwin. For more
information refer to the following articles:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;280743
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/clustergeo.mspx
recovery.
With SQL, you can also use log shipping to provide quick disaster
Database
With SQL 2005, you can now use Database Mirroring. For more info on
Mirroring refer to these links:http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/technologies/dbm_best_pract.mspx
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/dbmirfaq.mspx
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/dbmirror.mspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/themes/high-availability.mspx
support
I think your best, least expense, least complicated, and easiest to
solution will probably be database mirroring. Your mileage may vary.
--
Russ Kaufmann
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
Web http://www.clusterhelp.com
Blog http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp
The next ClusterHelp classes are:
Denver starting Nov 28th
NYC starting Dec 4th.
.
- References:
- SQL Server High Availability/Fault Tolerance.
- From: Sezgin
- Re: SQL Server High Availability/Fault Tolerance.
- From: Russ Kaufmann \(MVP\)
- SQL Server High Availability/Fault Tolerance.
- Prev by Date: Re: SQL Server High Availability/Fault Tolerance.
- Next by Date: Re: SQL Server High Availability/Fault Tolerance.
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL Server High Availability/Fault Tolerance.
- Next by thread: Re: SQL Server High Availability/Fault Tolerance.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|