DAS PowerVault 220S and 2*2950 Active/Passive SQL Cluster
- From: "rob" <robert_firth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Nov 2006 14:08:22 -0800
Hoping someone might help on this sizing problem:
I have ordered 2 * 2950s for DAS to a Dell PowerVault221S
On each node I will have
2 * 36GB drive RAID 1 for local OS on each node
2 * 73GB drive RAID 0 for a local backup destination
On the shared storage / powervault I have:
2 * 36GB for tran logs Raid1
4 * 73GB for the Data - RAID 10
Now I understand I need 2 more drives for the quorum, and the smallest
I could chose is
2 * 36GB
this seems very expensive when you only need maybe 1 GB of space. And
then I'm lead to believe I need another 2*36 gb for the MS DTC!
I understand I can share the MS DTC and Quorum but don't know how
detrimental this could be - any stats out there? Otherwise it's
another £600 to use best practice.
Many thanks
Rob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DAS PowerVault 220S and 2*2950 Active/Passive SQL Cluster
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- Re: DAS PowerVault 220S and 2*2950 Active/Passive SQL Cluster
- Prev by Date: Re: adding disk
- Next by Date: Re: How can i cluster sql 2005 for load balancing?
- Previous by thread: Re: How can i cluster sql 2005 for load balancing?
- Next by thread: Re: DAS PowerVault 220S and 2*2950 Active/Passive SQL Cluster
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading