Re: Are multiple-instances on a single cluster supported with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition?
- From: uttamkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Uttam Parui[MS])
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:17:46 GMT
Maria,
I am not a Licensing expert (yes, we have Licensing experts in Microsoft) but to find the answer to your qs
" We currently have four processor licenses. Each node has four processors. This is an Active/Passive configuration. Why would all processors on all hosts require licensing for a new instance in an
active/passive configuration?"
I searched the "SQL Server 2005 Licensing: Frequently Asked Questions"
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/faq.mspx
and found the following
Q. If I am doing log shipping in an active/passive failover configuration, how should I license the backup server?
A. In this scenario, the passive server does not require a license, unless the passive server has more processors than the active server, and the active server is licensed under the per processor model.
Since you will have 4 processor licenses and you are going to have an active/passive failover configuration, you do not need licenses for the passive node.
Now coming to your qs on running multiple instances on the active node
Q. How does licensing work with the multi-instance feature in SQL Server 2005?
A. You can run multiple instances of SQL Server 2005 on a single computer. Multiple instances are used by organizations that have several applications running on a server but want them to run in isolation so that any
problem in one instance will not affect the other instances. In SQL Server 2005, you can now run multiple instances with the Workgroup, Standard, and Enterprise editions when they are licensed server/CAL or on a
per-processor basis.
So, if you have processor licenses, you can run multiple-instances on the active node.
Note that if you have an active/active failover scenario then you will have to license the procs on both the active nodes.
BTW - For SQL Server 2005, one can have upto 25 clustered instances on the same cluster. 16 was the limit for SQL Server 2000.
Best Regards,
Uttam Parui
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Are you secure? For information about the Strategic Technology Protection Program and to order your FREE Security Tool Kit, please visit http://www.microsoft.com/security.
Microsoft highly recommends that users with Internet access update their Microsoft software to better protect against viruses and security vulnerabilities. The easiest way to do this is to visit the following websites:
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
http://www.microsoft.com/security/guidance/default.mspx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Are multiple-instances on a single cluster supported with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition?
- From: maria . d . stone
- Re: Are multiple-instances on a single cluster supported with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition?
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- Re: Are multiple-instances on a single cluster supported with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition?
- From: maria . d . stone
- Re: Are multiple-instances on a single cluster supported with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition?
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- Are multiple-instances on a single cluster supported with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition?
- Prev by Date: Globally separated cluster
- Next by Date: Re: Are multiple-instances on a single cluster supported with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are multiple-instances on a single cluster supported with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition?
- Next by thread: Re: Are multiple-instances on a single cluster supported with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|