Re: Moving the system databases from the A\A\P cluster

From: "Russ Kaufmann [MVP]" <russ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:02:39 -0600

"Manoj Kumar" <ManojKumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:83E8C047-B71E-4B1A-A009-FFCDE5B61A64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi There,

I am planning to move the system databases[Master,Model, Msdb and Tempdb]
from a drive to a different drive in the SAN [All part of the shared
resource].

My plan is to initiate a fail over to the passive node , perform this task
and restart the SQL Server services in the primary node.

Does anyone see any issues with this?

Why are you failing over? What does that accomplish?

--
Russ Kaufmann
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
Web http://www.clusterhelp.com
Blog http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp

.

Prev by Date: Re: Pros and Cons of Veritas Clustering vs SQL Native Clustering
Next by Date: Re: Cluster IP Address change
Previous by thread: Re: Pros and Cons of Veritas Clustering vs SQL Native Clustering
Next by thread: Re: Moving the system databases from the A\A\P cluster
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Windows 2003 Clustering - Impact Of Changing Quorum Resource
... quiet time however just in case!. ... if everything goes well there should be no impact on clustered resources ... behave as it would if you move cluster resource group to passive node - ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering)
Re: Windows 2003 Clustering - Impact Of Changing Quorum Resource
... if everything goes well there should be no impact on clustered resources (of ... It should behave ... as it would if you move cluster resource group to passive node - take ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering)