Re: Server availability in an Active Passive Cluster
- From: "Geoff N. Hiten" <SQLCraftsman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:51:19 -0400
If you leave the service running after clustering, then yes, you will get a
response. The virtual server CXSQL will have a different IP address than
either host node.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
<pavman27@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1152749127.015073.249110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry for the confusion. I currently have two SQL servers. SQL01 and
SQL02. They are currently not in a cluster. I have a number of
applications and documents that are referencing SQL01 as their data
source. When I create the Active/Passive cluster, I plan to create a
virtual server name, CXSQL.
My question is: Once the cluster is created, and SQL01 is the active
member of the cluster, if a client makes a SQL request to SQL01, will
the client get a response ?
I saw this KB doc
http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb;en-us;243218&spid=2852&sid=663:
SQL Server 2000 does not listen on the IP address of the local servers.
It listens only on the clustered IP addresses created during the setup
of a virtual server for SQL Server 2000.
Obviously the SQL01 and CXSQL will have different IP numbers. What this
is telling me is that once I cluster the server, I have to make sure I
go around to all of my applications and make sure they use the virtual
server name CXSQL, instead of SQL01. I was hoping for a grace period to
get all the applications changed over to the new SQL name.
I am asking this question, because with our File Server cluster, the
active server FS1, is accessible the same way as the virtual file
server name cxfs1. I realize that referencing using the FS1 name will
be a problem if that fails, but I was just looking for some time to
hunt down these apps and change their data source.
Thank you,
Dave
.
- References:
- Server availability in an Active Passive Cluster
- From: pavman27
- Re: Server availability in an Active Passive Cluster
- From: Russ Kaufmann [MVP]
- Re: Server availability in an Active Passive Cluster
- From: pavman27
- Server availability in an Active Passive Cluster
- Prev by Date: Re: Server availability in an Active Passive Cluster
- Next by Date: Re: Server availability in an Active Passive Cluster
- Previous by thread: Re: Server availability in an Active Passive Cluster
- Next by thread: Re: Server availability in an Active Passive Cluster
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading