Re: Active/Active/Active/Passive and Database Mirroring
- From: "Geoff N. Hiten" <SQLCraftsman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 15:10:54 -0500
Instances are installed to the entire cluster, but can be set to prefer
certain nodes. I personally like N-1 clusters (N nodes, N-1 Instances),
just to simplfy management, but other that is not an absolute, inflexible
standard.
Each instance has completely separate resources; IP address, Data disks, Log
Disks, TempDB, and Network Name. Each instance works and appears as a
separate and distinct SQL Server.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Chad T" <ChadT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B13AE62F-89A3-405F-9F14-FE979336CC7B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We have 4 systems that was initially planned to be joined into an
Active/Active/Active/Passive cluster with SQL 2005.
Can anyone offer a suggestion on the number of instances to install per
node?
Does each instance need seperate Disks for the Database, Logs and TempDB?
If we stay with this configuration will Database mirroring still be an
option with the configuration once it is supported by MS.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: re IP servers in a cluster and cluster resources
- Next by Date: Re: SQL2005 Cluster (MSDN) - no failover possible - Error 19019
- Previous by thread: SQL2005 Cluster (MSDN) - no failover possible - Error 19019
- Next by thread: Re: Active/Active/Active/Passive and Database Mirroring
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|